Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
BJPsych open ; 7(Suppl 1):S93-S93, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1661305

ABSTRACT

Aims This audit was carried out in response to the Coronavirus pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many teams to review how they provide care to their patients. Due to attempting to reduce the spead of COVID-19, the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service within the Northern Health and Social Care Trust largely switched to telephone reviews instead of face-to-face reviews for non-urgent outpatient appointments from March 2020 onwards. The aim of this audit was to establish whether or not service users found telephone reviews to be as useful and therapeutic as the previous standard face-to-face reviews. Method A questionnaire was used to assess opinions on telephone reviews. Those who were answering the questions were asked to rate their answers on the following scale: “not at all”, “a little”, “somewhat” or “a great deal”. There was an “any other comments” section at the end where service users could give detailed opinions on how successful they thought telephone reviews were. A sample of twenty patients was involved. This cohort of twenty patients was a mixture of ten ADHD reviews and ten medication reviews. The audit was conducted by one person and this was done via the telephone. Result For questions one to four (which will be fully outlined in the poster), the most popular category chosen was “somewhat” and this indicates that the majority of patients found telephone reviews somewhat better than face-to-face appointments. For question five (which was- “Overall, was the help you received good?”), 80% of service users stated that the help that they received was “a great deal” better than the help that they had received at previous face-to-face appointments. Lastly, for question six (which was- “If a friend or family member needed similar help, would you recommend that they are phoned by our service?”), 80% of service users said that they would recommend our service “a great deal” to family members or friends. Conclusion Generally the feedback was positive for the telephone reviews. However, some still outlined a preference for face-to-face reviews. There may have been bias in this audit as it was the same doctor who did the telephone reviews as conducted the audit. To conclude, telemedicine is likely to become more popular in the future especially as the Coronavirus pandemic is still currently a worldwide problem therefore it is important to explore how service users feel about this as a way of communicating with the clinicians who are treating them.

2.
NASN Sch Nurse ; 36(5): 292-299, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1338900

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic altered traditional education models and school nursing practice during the 2020-2021 school year. As schools plan to reopen for the 2021-2022 school year, school nurses must arm themselves with the most recent evidence-based knowledge and tools to promote the health and safety of the school community. Schools will need to continue infection control measures and strategies to support the social emotional needs of students and staff to promote a safe and healthy learning environment on return to school. Partnered with local health departments, school nurses are vital to mitigation measures such as on-site viral testing and vaccination. A successful school year depends on strong nursing leadership.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Nursing Staff/psychology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/standards , School Nursing/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL